Dull thoughts on a shiny, shiny world.
As most are probably aware, Bali bomb suspect Abu Bakar Bashir was sentenced yesterday to 30 months in prison for his involvement in an 'evil conspiracy'. Naturally the US and the Australian governments complained through both official channels and the press about the lightness of the sentence. But that's not the interesting bit. What I found more entertaining was Mr Natalegawa's response:

Mr Natalegawa says Indonesia, unlike many countries, has processed its terrorism suspects through the courts. "I know of many far more high-profile cases where the perpetrators are still at large, or if they have been caught remain incarcerated without any proper trial," Mr Natalegawa said.

Touche, eh? Sure, they can't keep the bastards in prison for very long, but they're still doing better than we are (by we I mean the US and Australia). At least they've managed to bring them to trial. And we thought Muslims were the enemy...

Comments
on Jun 20, 2005
A very witty comment. Very true too. Funny how everyone has a big stink about Corby, but Hicks and Habib, who cares?
on Jun 21, 2005
Yeah. I'm glad to say I've missed most of Corby fever by virtue of being overseas, but what I've heard about Australians demanding their tsunami donations back is not cool at all.

I've always liked Natalegawa's work. He has a dry sense of humour that's unusual in a politician, and that was a classic example.

Habib's back home isn't he? I heard he got released but I hvaen't heard much else since then. Has anything been happening with Hicks?
on Jun 24, 2005
Habib is indeed back home but they're keeping him heavily surveilled, so the definition of free country is getting looser. They have finally laid some charges against Hicks, but they sound like they're making it up as they go along.

"charged by the US Government with conspiracy, attempted murder and aiding the enemy."

Aiding the enemy?! What does that mean? "we are arresting you for not being in the US Army". Surely that's the whole point of war? You have two opposing sides?

Attempted murder? It's war! Is he supposed to sit there and watch? If a soldier kills someone in war, surely that isn't murder?

Conspiracy? This apparently means that he trained with the other team. Basically they've arrested him for not being on their side. And the evidence is pretty weak as far as I can see. It's a kangaroo court. Give me an Indonesian trial any day over a USA trial!

Where overseas are you btw?
on Jun 27, 2005
So they found some charges? That's a surprise. I am definitely surprised though that they can lay a charge of 'aiding and abetting the enemy'. I thought that could only be applied when a declaration of war had been made.

I didn't realise he was even on the front-lines! When did he try to murder someone? Was that when the soldiers jumped him, or before?

Does sound suspiciously like a kangaroo court. At least it's an Australian kangaroo court though, with authentic Australian sham judges rather than inexperienced American sham judges - or are they shipping him stateside for the judgement?

I'm in Indonesia by the way. For some strange reason the Indon press hasn't been following the Habib case all that closely.