Dull thoughts on a shiny, shiny world.
My experiences at the ballot box today
Published on October 8, 2004 By cactoblasta In Politics
Today I voted for the first time in my country's elections. There were five names on the house of reps ballot and 13 on the senate one. And while I spent a few minutes thinking about who I would rather have in power, I knew all along that what I voted was irrelevent, that I knew before voting that even if there was a change in the elected officials it would have no effect on my life.

I am one of the forgotten people. As a young man with no children, moderately wealthy parents and in the dying days of my university education, there isn't a party in the land that offers a credible good deal for me. Not for me the baby bonus, not for me the childcare copayments, not for me the tax cuts, not for me the improvement of the public health system. Instead both major parties have failed me in nearly every respect. It doesn't help either that the seat I live in is as safe as any in Australia and that there aren't enough senate seats to make bribes likely.

As I meandered into my local primary school to vote for the first time it struck me how pointless the whole exercise is. Nothing is going to change because of my vote, even if the government does change. Both parties have roughly the same foreign policy, both have the same attitudes to health, education and welfare (limit funding increases and watch inflation tear them apart), both have the same outdated view of society.

To rephrase Ford, "Politics is bunk."

Comments
on Oct 08, 2004
wow you got off easy.

I had 6 on the green paper and 50 on the white and I numbered all 50 because I wanted to know where my preferences were going. This was my second election (I voted in 2001) but this time I actually did a little research into the parties so I didn't have to eeiny-meenie-miney mo like last time.
In the end I still didn't know anything about half the candidates - 50 people - lots of independents and random parties -- like something about fishing and dads who don't have custody of their kids party.

I really do hope our vots does count for something and that there will be a change in government but something tells me Howard will win again.
on Oct 08, 2004
Interesting the way you lament your lot, Cacto. What exactly do you expect? Should government (& your vote) be about what special favors are being handed out to you (or not, in this case)? I ask this sincerely, with no disrespect - I'm just curious about how you view the relationship of government to citizen.

Cheers,
Daiwa
on Oct 09, 2004
I'm more lamenting the fact that people like me are never considered as worthy of political interest. If you live in a marginal seat it's almost certain that both major parties will go out of their way to bribe you into voting for them. If you have a mortgage and/or children then you are also likely to be courted. But if you're single, middle-class and young then the major parties have no interest in you or in your interests.

I want a a political system where the needs of all Australians are considered, and not simply those whose votes have been mathematically and statistically proven to be important in winning elections. The current system punishes visionaries and rewards the grey, drab suit of the spin doctor and her lackeys. Everyone misses out when policies are solely aimed at particular groups, even if they are large in number.

For example in the recent campaign both parties tried to posture themselves as being "green" by focusing on old-growth forest logging in Tasmania. Had either been serious they would have considered "green" issues on a wider level. But the point wasn't to actually change policies in order to gain government, but to change minds into thinking existing policy is green. This process largely ends up meaning that the process itself is meaningless because it only leads to the appearance of change, not any real change.
on Oct 09, 2004
For example in the recent campaign both parties tried to posture themselves as being "green" by focusing on old-growth forest logging in Tasmania. Had either been serious they would have considered "green" issues on a wider level. But the point wasn't to actually change policies in order to gain government, but to change minds into thinking existing policy is green. This process largely ends up meaning that the process itself is meaningless because it only leads to the appearance of change, not any real change.


So can you see some of the problems we have with the two major parties across the pond in the U.S.?


We got one sticking to his guns which are good in some places (including the EPA) and another who is saying I want to make changes with no solid proof or evidence to back up his claim?
Than you have one of the major parties tell people they are wasting their votes on the Third Parties by not voting for them.
Yet that same major party always chant 'every vote counts' so is that hypocrisy or not?

Politics is one hell of a problem wherever it exists.

- GX
on Oct 09, 2004
Your reply didn't quite get at what I'm curious about. Why should you or people in similar circustances be "courted" as you put it? I may be wrong, but I get the impression you feel you have no opportunity to achieve success or happiness without the government doing something for you. Am I misreading you? You sound so despondent over not being able to feed at the trough, as it were.

Cheers,
Daiwa
on Oct 09, 2004
I think despondent is too strong a word; mildly irritated is probably closer to the truth. I just tend to write more exaggerated than I actually feel. It's not so much that I should be courted, so much as that I can see that because I'm not my vote is worthless. If my vote did in fact have significance and meaning I would have been courted; as I'm not, the only logical assumption is that it's worthless. I've more or less wasted my time.