Dull thoughts on a shiny, shiny world.
And other things that irk me
Published on February 27, 2006 By cactoblasta In Misc
There are many things that irk me about some greenies. Their rank personal hygiene, the tendency towards irrational and blind obedience to their ideology, their near-fatal lack of a sense of humour, their limited vision for the future.

But perhaps the most vexing from my point of view is their near-unshakable belief that we should all 'get back to nature'.

I understand of course that they wish to contribute in some way to this process - I feel there can be no other explanation for cultivating hairstyles and clothing that moves even without a breeze. But frankly I agree with those elements of human society that I think could be called the civilisationists.

According to this camp the last 10,000 years of human evolution and development has been a desperate attempt to escape nature. Why else, they argue, do humans group together in cities? Why else does nearly every examined human society reject the tenets of Darwinism? Why, the popularised version asks, don't rabid environmentalists get back in their trees and fling poo at each other if they wish so greatly to 'get back to nature'?

For that is what 'getting back to nature' must mean. Humanity has, through the millenia, discovered methods of controlling and shaping the environment around it. There is no greater irony than the hunter who drives her humvee to 'get back to nature'. What is natural about driving a car, wearing mechanically constructed or even hand-woven clothing, walking upright or wielding weaponry? Certainly there are animal species that wield tools and possess culture of a sorts - chimps are one example - but realistically speaking they are the exception, not the norm, and nothing exceptional could be considered truly natural by an organised human mind.

I doubt it's even remotely possible for any western person to 'get back to nature'. Our very mindsets subsume the natural order of existence - we are trained from birth to protect the weaker members of our species, to build, to acquire, to think.

Throw a westerner into the jungle and they instinctively do the unnatural. They build shelter, construct weapons, maintain certain rituals - often including the wearing of clothing.

Humanity is naturally accustomed to performing unnatural acts. There is little more tiresome than some hobo with a social conscience telling me that I should abandon my ipod, my studies and my city to live at one with the very thing my ancestors fought so hard to avoid.

It may be unnatural to be civilised, but I wouldn't give it up for all the fungal infections in the world. I wish those rabid greenies would go off somewhere and fester in peace.

Comments
on Feb 27, 2006
I agree!

Because of my background, once in awhile I am asked to give a speech or do a class on preparedness. One of the first things I cover is that "humans are very adaptable creatures" is a myth. We don't survive by adapting to our surroundings, we survive by adapting our surroundings to us.

The basics of preparedness is "food, shelter and clothing"... look around nature, every living thing needs food, only some living things need shelter, but we alone need clothing.

Some people argue that we don't actually "need" clothing, but if we chose to live with nature naked, we would be forced to stay in areas hospitable to our skind... which would mean limited sunlight, limited humidity and only around a 20 degree window of temperature extremes. ;~D
on Feb 27, 2006
I'd submit there is no nature to get back too...if everyone attempted to do that...the woods and plains would be brimming with the unwashed masses.

An aside. I lived in Alaska for several years. It was as "back to nature" socially as one could possibly get. I went months on end without socializing with any adults other than my husband WHEN HE WAS HOME...which was not much....'

They can keep it the whole back to nature crap....as long as they keep it FAR from me.
on Feb 28, 2006
Some people argue that we don't actually "need" clothing, but if we chose to live with nature naked, we would be forced to stay in areas hospitable to our skind... which would mean limited sunlight, limited humidity and only around a 20 degree window of temperature extremes.


Exactly. Damn hippies.

They can keep it the whole back to nature crap....as long as they keep it FAR from me.


I hear you loud and clear! Why on earth did you move to Alaska to live? Is your husband in mining or forestry or something like that? I don't think there's much that could motivate me to move beyond the world's semi-tropical regions. I did the jungle last year, and that's about as much integration with nature I could stand.