Dull thoughts on a shiny, shiny world.
A crutch for the oh-so-modern
Published on December 3, 2006 By cactoblasta In Humor
Good is out. No one who's anyone aspires to be a good person anymore. And why would you? As a person of considerable virtue you get absolutely nothing of any value in life.

I mean, what do you get?

Self-satisfaction? Off-hand I can think of dozens of extremely satisfying but not particularly moral ways of getting a thrill.

Freedom from Guilt? As a Catholic I have religious course to Confession, the sinner's greatest boon. Just confess and all that guilt washes away like milk off teflon. As a heretic there are still plenty of avenues - liquor, music, logic, hypocrisy (my personal favourite), and the best of all - self-righteousness. If you believe you sin for a purpose (whether it's the guiding hand of economic prosperity or the furtherance of the Dark Lord's vile plans) guilt is no more than a passing fancy, to be indulged in when in company and discarded when there's a hint of pleasure on the breeze.

The love of your neighbour? I can't speak for you, but I detest my neighbours. It's one of my favourite hobbies. There's nothing in life more cleansing than a deep and full loathing for someone who is utterly deserving. It makes art of petty cruelty.

Friends, we need to face the facts, and what better way than through a hackneyed cliche of a truism. the wages of sin may be death, but at least with sin you get a day off. Virtue's all day every day and holidays are out of the question due to the horrors of relatives and people who refuse to speak English (dirty foreign buggers).

But what do you get out of being a selfish bastard?

Why everything dear friend!

Do you know you're doing something despicable, but need some justification? Reach into the selfish bastard toolbox and justify, justify, justify. As any career diplomat will tell you (and trust me, I know a few) there is no sin so great it cannot be explained in a footnote. You bulldoze an orphanage and have the kids shipped off to the bottom of the Thames? Bury the details and hold a press conference announcing that you sent them to an exclusive London clinic for their health.

No one's going to believe you, but the press'll have little choice but to report your story.

Not quite that famous? Life becomes even easier.

Did you steal from your next-door neighbour? Totally understandable, but if you get caught claim Ayn Rand. I can guarantee you hardly anyone has read her, so if you make up some ostentatiously absurd theory involving instilling the value of price-demand econometrics in a post-Bretton Woods world in your children they may let you go.

Selfish is good, and increasingly these days it's seen as the noble choice. American children have been taught for generations that they have rights, and by now they've even begun to believe it (precious little beggars that they are). So naturally, being a thoroughly modern individual and a student of the American school, declare your 'rights' at every opportunity. You have a right to respect. You have a right to free stuff. You have a right to be called sir, maam or whatever else rocks your boat.

The world now has a responsibility to provide your needs - it would be intolerable for a right to be refused, right?

But are there any other advantages to sin, I hear you demand in an aggressive tone that truly touches your humble teacher's heart, are there any other advantages beyond simply being able to get away with it?

My only reply would be that you are a simple soul, and have missed the essential point. It's not just that you can do what you want. It's that people will think highly of you for doing so!

Never before has it been possible to drive a man out of house and home and come off looking noble, but if recent court cases are any judge the tides have changed. The slumlord and the weaponsmaker no longer merely command the respect of high society but all society. Their incurable lust for injustice is lauded as 'economically sound' and 'patriotic', their excesses as 'infotainment' and their artificially beautiful spouses as 'desirable' and 'as now as the adoption of black babies'.

The racist and 'culturalist' (one of my absolute favourite new words by the way - note how its bland nature avoids the infamy of the word racist whilst simultaneously suggesting there is something horribly inferior about other cultures. It's charmingly two-faced!) can speak freely, get admonished, and then ferociously defended with a tenacity and fervour that is most pleasing to other selfish bastards.

So, to end my rambling call to arms, I leave you this message:

God so loved the truth that he gave us lies, and virtue that he gave us vice; for what is yin without yang and up without down except a word empty of all meaning waiting for the opportunistic to fill it? So bring vice into your heart and use virtue as a human shield, a whore wheezing and oozing after years of your abuse but, with a wig, still proudly proclaiming your dubious virtues to the world.

Drag virtue down to the level of vice and smear it with the excrement of contempt and the blood of abuse. Be the selfish bastard, the downfall of western civilisation. Be the Future.

Because to be anything else is to show a thoroughly un-modern personality that is utterly unfashionable.

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Dec 05, 2006
...and if you believe that God is the author of our biology, you can say both at the same time.
on Dec 05, 2006
Do you believe that people really do anything that they don't feel is in their own self interest? I don't.


I do. I think quite highly of people as individuals. It's only en masse that they become selfish buggers.

Hardly seems 'altruistic' to me...or even in the best interests of their countrymen or themselves. Then again, I never could get my head around zealotry.


I reckon suicide bombers/grenade jumpers/anyone else who gives their life in service of another are largely driven by hope, that their sacrifice will achieve something meaningful. What that has to do with altruism I don't claim to know.

That "still, small voice" thing, hmm? I suppose some would call it a biological imperative, others would call it 'God.'


I'd call it conditioning from the few individuals in society who are born with a soul. How many people are virtuous solely because vice is so hard? It's the examples of the saints and the punishments of the influenced tyrants that keep us good, not any inherent goodness in the majority.

Don't ya just hate it when a humorous bit goes all serious on ya?


It's annoying, I'll grant you that. Obviously virtue and vice are a button issue for some people.
on Dec 05, 2006
"I reckon suicide bombers/grenade jumpers/anyone else who gives their life in service of another are largely driven by hope, that their sacrifice will achieve something meaningful. What that has to do with altruism I don't claim to know."


I faltered and went back and checked the definition of altruism:

"unselfish regard for or devotion to the welfare of others".


That sounds a lot like people who kill themselves hoping it "will achieve something meaningful". They see how martyrs are remembered, hailed, carried around in effigy after their deaths by the lauding, hateful masses. If you can't see the selfishness in wanting to be remembered that way I don't know how you can miss it.
on Dec 05, 2006
Exactly. It doesn't seem very altruistic to me. Altruism, compassion, love, forgiveness - they're all horribly outdated concepts that have no place in modern life. As modern men and women we reject them utterly. It's only by doing what we want that we can, well, do what we want.
on Dec 05, 2006

Huh? Where did that rant come from? This article is supposed to be light and frivolous. I am advocating doing whatever you feel like and then justifying your pleasure-seeking with selfish virtue, which is my favourite 21st century vogue. I have no idea what that has to do with modern liberals, benevolent corporate types and people who only have the courage to speak.

Let's be wholly clear - I'm arguing for vice veiled with virtue, not preachiness backed up with mundanity and an appalling lack of courage (which seems to be what your ranting against). Relax, Brad. Take it easy. I'm not talking about you or whatever it is that brought on your mid-life angst.

My response was supposed to be humorous too. I was trying to be clear it was meant to be humorous by explicitly stating imy response was sarcastic.  Sorry!

on Dec 22, 2006

sorry for coming in so late, but i just had to say something ... this is wonderful! i adored it. you have to be very deep to make light of such shallowness. (i should know).

great stuff, cacto.

mig xxx

on Dec 22, 2006
Thanks Mig, but trust me - I'm so shallow that deep thoughts barely even pause on their way straight through my head. My only depth is in my unswerving devotion to irrelevencies.
on Dec 22, 2006
Do you believe that people really do anything that they don't feel is in their own self interest? I don't.


Bingo!


Cacto - this was a good read and for the cynic in each one of us (plural in me) a good giggle!

Have a very happy christmas and don't get too much sun!

SmileyCentral.com
2 Pages1 2